In which of these systems is the government most likely to provide people with goods and services they could not otherwise afford?

In a command economy, the government exerts significant control over the economy and often takes on the role of producer and distributor of goods and services. This system is characterized by central planning, where the government determines what to produce, how to produce it, and who receives the goods and services.

One of the key features of a command economy is the government's commitment to providing basic needs and essential services, such as healthcare, education, and housing, to all citizens, regardless of their ability to pay. This is particularly important for individuals and families who might otherwise struggle to afford these necessities in a more market-driven environment.

In contrast, market economies rely on supply and demand to distribute resources, often leaving gaps where some individuals may not be able to afford necessary goods and services. A mixed economy includes both market and command economy elements but still allows the market to play a predominant role in resource distribution. Traditional economies are often based on customs and barter, which do not typically provide the same level of government-funded services.

Thus, a command economy is most likely to ensure that goods and services are accessible to all, particularly to those who could not afford them through private market mechanisms.